Ban Ki Moon’s child killer attitude creates an “unfortunate situation.”

Why have just one standard when you can have two? Ban Ki Moon once admitted the UN is biased against Israel and since then he’s never uttered a more honest word since, certainly not an honest word at all when it comes to the Jewish State. Most recently, Ban Ki Moon expressed alarm at the number of Gazan children that died in Gaza’s war with Israel while failing to acknowledge Gazan civilian deaths are a major part of Hamas’ strategy and that Hamas intentionally endangers civilians on both sides and uses its citizens as human shields. He also failed to acknowledge the great lengths Israel went to in warning civilians, so much so that both Germany and the US complained Israel had gone too far and it may tie the hands of democracies in future conflicts.  Meanwhile, Saddam Hussein’s Iraq and now Assad’s Syria and many other places have no real reason to take UN standards on anything regarding human rights seriously. By having two standards, Ban Ki Moon and the UN have none and why should terrorist organizations fear world standards when they are only born of political expedience?  World standards for civilians don’t really exist because they are only used as a political convenience.  When world standards can be jerry rigged and misapplied against one’s enemies or peoples that are detested such as Jews and Israelis then the UN is simply telling any terrorist organization and especially Israel’s enemies that the UN will provide cover for their abuses.

"...by sheer force of blaming the victim the world leader can tell the world it’s okay to abuse and kill children..."

Bashar Assad, Hassan Nasrallah, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, Qasim al-Raymi,  Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi need not care about UN human rights standards and children are for abusing and killing!  Why else would the Secretary General, the leader of world government choose to blame Israel for Hamas’ choices while ignoring Israel’s unprecedented attempts to avoid civilian casualties?   The only time the UN is going to care about civilian deaths, especially those of children is when that is the squeaky wheel that needs oil of the month from some public that wants to use the UN as a tool for abuse, the and it will be just as quickly forgotten because the “outrage” will have  dissipated. Whatever the UN is, it is not a world government that will ever cry over the dead body of any child in Gaza. That is the substance of Ban Ki Moon’s complaint to Israel, that is his message to terrorists the world over.  Ban Ki Moon isn’t the first world leader to diminish the idea of world government by being unfair to Israel but it is still rare that by sheer force of blaming the victim the world leader can tell the world it’s okay to abuse and kill children and it is rarer still that a secretary general is already on record for admitting bias against Israel exists.  This misapplication of justice contributes to the murder of children, especially in Syria and Iraq. I’m not saying these regimes would not kill children if the UN and Ban Ki Moon acted more justly but American’s know from the recent shooting in a church, a violent, terrorist good ole boys club incubated by years of looking the other way and justice being misapplied it its favor goes down hard and at great cost. What is the point of world government if it doesn’t care about our children getting murdered, getting used as soldiers, getting raped and sold as wives to terrorists? What’s the point of world government if these crimes are just ammo against undesirable people and unpopular nations who fights these terrors? Thanks to ISIS, at least the Middle East is starting to see what this kind of hypocrisy costs so why is Ban KI Moon still immune to being just?